Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials and confidence can intimidate juries. It provides tools for leveling the playing field by challenging assumptions, narrowing opinions, and reframing expertise in accessible, relatable terms.
Through structured questioning and careful preparation, lawyers learn to expose bias, highlight limitations, and reinforce their own narrative—ensuring experts inform the case rather than dominate it.
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...